01 / Technical Notes · Editorial draft
When two names are not one person
A proposed approach to historical entity resolution that preserves competing identities and the evidence behind each match.
Read the note: When two names are not one person ↗Research / Historical knowledge systems
Historical intelligence infrastructure needs methods that preserve the relationship between a claim and its evidence. Geyserich’s developing research programme examines archival methodology, entity resolution and evidence graphs. These drafts set out proposed methods, design decisions and open research questions.
The initial collection contains editorial drafts prepared for review. These are proposed methods and design notes, not peer-reviewed publications, benchmarks or reports of completed partnerships.
01 / Technical Notes · Editorial draft
A proposed approach to historical entity resolution that preserves competing identities and the evidence behind each match.
Read the note: When two names are not one person ↗02 / Knowledge Graph Research · Editorial draft
A proposed evidence graph connecting persons, places, events, documents, sources and time periods while retaining claim provenance and review states.
Read the note: A knowledge graph is only as useful as its source trail ↗03 / Historical Data Methodology · Editorial draft
A proposed collection pilot method covering scope, digitization, structured records, AI-assisted extraction and expert review under agreed access conditions.
Read the note: Beyond the scan: preserving context in archival AI ↗System design, extraction methods and historical entity resolution. The current note examines identity matching and review decisions.
Source description, archival context, transcription review and dataset preparation. The current note sets out a proposed collection pilot method.
Claims, provenance, temporal context and relationship evidence states. The current note examines how a graph retains its source trail.
A future category for documented collaboration methods, findings and limitations, subject to collection permissions. No collaboration reports are currently available.
Architecture & engineering
Explore the proposed evidence model and integrity boundaries. Future engineering notes, architecture explanations, methodology, archive reports and research papers have explicit publication categories.
Read technical documentation ↗Research collaboration
We welcome discussion with archivists, historians, genealogists and researchers in historical language processing.
Discuss a research collaboration ↗